By Marcial Bonifacio
August 31, 2020
My friends and countrymen, as we observe National Heroes' Day on August 31, 2020, it is most appropriate to contemplate our country’s sovereignty, which includes maritime rights. Throughout his term, President Rodrigo Duterte has repeatedly expressed the false notion that China is “in possession” of the West Philippine Sea (WPS) and that the Philippines is powerless to assert its sovereign rights therein, short of waging war with China, the latest declaration having been made in his last State of the Nation Address on July 27. Consequently, every time he does so, his critics persistently rebut him, particularly the astute Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio, who was instrumental in the favorable 2016 ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) on the WPS.
In my “Open Letter to President Duterte” and “Why Filipinos Should Give a
Damn about Panatag Shoal,” I have presented some of Carpio’s advice on how the
Philippines can, indeed, enforce its arbitral award without waging war with
China, some of which I have likewise enumerated below. Some of them are Carpio’s direct response to
Duterte upon publicly asking him what action to undertake, as in the following
dialogue:
“Xi Jinping [said] there will be trouble,” stated Duterte, “so answer me,
Justice, give me the formula and I’ll do it.”
“My response is yes, Mr. President, there is a formula,” replied Carpio, “and
not only one but many ways of enforcing the arbitral award without going to war
with China, using only the rule of law.”
Without further ado, I present those
options which Carpio stated should be implemented “together to fortify the award
part by part, brick by brick, until the award is fully enforced.”
- The Philippines can join a convention with Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei regarding the South China Sea. The convention can declare that no geologic feature in the Spratly Islands generates an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and that there are only territorial seas from the geologic features that are above water at high tide, as ruled by the PCA. According to Carpio, China will be "isolated" as the only country claiming EEZs from the Spratly Islands. Countries that assert freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea are also expected to follow such a convention, he added.
- The Philippines can invite Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei to conduct joint FONOPs in respective EEZs facing the West Philippine Sea. "This will be a common assertion by 5 coastal states that each of them have their own respective EEZs in South China Sea thereby enforcing the arbitral award that China's 9-dash line has no legal effect and cannot serve as basis to claim the waters of the South China Sea," Carpio said. By conducting joint FONOPs, it will also affirm the EEZ of the Philippines in the West Philippine Sea. Carpio said that while the Philippines should welcome and join these operations, it has instead distanced the country from them, saying the Philippines "does not take sides" in disputes between China and other countries in the area, a seemingly treacherous gesture vis-à-vis the oldest and most loyal ally, the U.S.
- The Philippines can welcome and encourage the freedom of navigation and overflight operations (FONOPs) of the U.S., U.K., France, Australia, Japan, India and Canada in the South China Sea, including the West Philippine Sea. The naval and aerial operations of these naval powers, which are in conformity with UNCLOS and customary international law, have increased in frequency since the 2016 PCA award, and are what Carpio describes as the “most robust enforcement” of the arbitral award, bridging the gap between the rule of law and the rule of justice.
- The Philippines can persuade the U.S. to declare Panatag Shoal as part of Philippine territory, which would protect it under the 1951 Philippine-U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT). Such action would add clarity for legal ramifications, since the shoal was known to be under Philippine jurisdiction as early as the American colonial period and even under Spanish rule. The Japanese did precisely that with their Senkaku islands, which the U.S. declared as part of Japan’s territory for purposes of the U.S.-Japan Mutual Defense Treaty.
- The Philippines could send the Philippine Navy to patrol Panatag Shoal. “As the South China Sea is part of the Pacific,” stated U.S. State Sec. Mike Pompeo, “any armed attack on any Philippine forces, aircraft, or public vessels in the South China Sea will trigger mutual defense treaty obligations under Article 4 of our Mutual Defense Treaty.” Of course, that would prompt the U.S. Navy to intervene.
- The Philippines can resume joint naval patrols with the U.S. in the West Philippine Sea in order to project military might, which could deter China from continuing its island-building activity on Panatag Shoal.
- The Philippine Coast Guard can send its ten 44-meter multi-role response vessels that were donated by Japan to patrol the West Philippine Sea. These vessels, Carpio said, are ideal for patrolling and catching poachers in the Philippines' EEZ in the West Philippine Sea. Doing so will also assert the country's sovereign rights in the maritime area.
- Congress can enact legislation to make permanent the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) and the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA). Indeed, the MDT would be rendered obsolete without either of them as elucidated by Foreign Affairs Sec. Teodoro Locsin:
The Mutual Defense Treaty without the VFA and EDCA may be compared to a deflated balloon. For all practical purposes, it becomes an extra large rubber for an Asian. Far more elastic than he can ever need for its purpose and far more suitable as a shower cap than a prophylactic against foreign aggression.
Aside from the two treaties giving teeth to the MDT, making them permanent would revitalize and fortify America’s alliance with the Philippines while deterring China and other potential aggressors, as well as quelling terrorist threats.
- The Philippines can emulate
America’s foreign policy of imposing visa restrictions on all persons and
business entities which Pompeo characterizes as “responsible for, or complicit
in, either the large-scale reclamation, construction, or militarization of
disputed outposts in the South China Sea, or [the People’s Republic of China’s]
use of coercion against Southeast Asian claimants to inhibit their access to
offshore resources.”
- The
Philippines can terminate contracts with Chinese firms which are, in any way,
involved in reclamation and militarization activities in the WPS. In fact, Locsin has already publicly said he
would make such a recommendation to the appropriate agencies.
- The
Philippines can file an extended continental shelf claim in the West Philippine
Sea beyond the 200-nautical mile EEZ off the coast of Luzon, where China is the
only opposite coastal state. The Philippines can file this unilaterally with
the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. China cannot invoke
historic rights under its nine-dash line claim which has already been ruled
without legal effect by the PCA. China’s own extended continental shelf does
not overlap with the extended continental shelf of the Philippines in this
maritime area.
- The Philippines can “bring China’s
threat of war to another United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS) arbitral tribunal, to secure an order directing China to comply with
the ruling of the UNCLOS arbitral tribunal that declared the Reed Bank part of
Philippine EEZ.” He added that the “Philippines can also ask for damages
for every day of delay that the Philippines is prevented by China from
exploiting Philippine EEZ.”
- The
Philippines can facilitate efforts of active citizens to enforce the arbitral
award.
Carpio referred to the case filed by former Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario and
former Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales against Chinese President Xi Jinping
before the International Criminal Court. The complaint accused Xi of crimes
against humanity over environmental damage in the South China Sea.
- According to Senator Richard Gordon,
the National Security Council can regularly convene and collaborate with a
think tank paneled by foreign policy and defense experts. Such regular meetings could keep the
Philippines prepared for various contingencies.
“Alam
naman natin na there is always contention in that area,” stated Gordon, “kaya
dapat nakahanda tayo kung ano ang mangyayari diyan.”
- The
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) can and should immediately issue a
clarification that China is in fact not in possession, and legally can never be
in possession, of the WPS. According to Carpio,
the international law doctrine of unilateral declarations can bind the
Philippines to Duterte’s statement about China’s alleged possession of the WPS,
whereby China can claim the Philippines has forfeited its sovereign rights. Hence, clarification from the DFA is
essential.
- The
Senate and the House of Representatives can pass resolutions declaring that
China is not in possession of the WPS.
- All
professional, civic, social, political, student, and alumni organizations, and
all Filipino citizens, can and should overwhelm Malacañang with statements and
text messages: China is not, and will never be, in possession of the WPS.
In conclusion, my friends and
countrymen, lest the Philippines becomes “a province of China,” we can and must
assert our sovereign rights in the WPS, regardless of Duterte’s rhetoric. In the authoritative words of Carpio, “The
Filipino people should not be intimidated by national leaders who peddle a
false option that either we go to war with China or submit to China. This false
option should be discredited once and for all. . . We cannot adopt a defeatist
attitude and just sit idly by and let China seize what international law has
declared to be our own Exclusive Economic Zone. . . This is the moment for all
Filipinos to unite in defense of Philippine sovereign rights in the WPS.”
Mabuhay ang Pilipinas!
Stay informed!
Join a community of engaged patriots passionate about liberty, good governance, and strengthening U.S.-Philippine relations. By subscribing to Marcial's Law, you’ll receive exclusive insights and updates on policies that shape the future of both nations. Be part of the conversation that challenges the status quo and advocates for a return to constitutional principles. Subscribe now and never miss a critical update!
https://pocket.co/xhEESG
I appreciate the link to the article, Bubbly. It seems that Duterte is more appeasing than his own defense secretary, Delfin Lorenzana, who has been more vocal on China's incursions in the West Philippine Sea.
Who owns Scarborough Shoal and why does China want Scarborough Shoal?
That is a most relevant question, Bubbly, because if there is global consensus, then there would be no dispute between China and the Philippines. Therein lies the problem. According to international law, the Philippines owns Scarborough Shoal. According to China's own metric, which is known as the "nine-dash line," it belongs to China. However, the UN arbitral tribunal (which handles such global disputes also called the Permanent Court of Arbitration) ruled in favor of the Philippines while invalidating China's nine-dash line in 2016.
Scarborough Shoal is abundant in fish, oil, gas, and minerals. It is also strategically located in the West Philippine Sea (also known as the South China Sea), wherein approximately $5 trillion of goods pass. Hence, it is commonly believed by maritime experts that China has militarized islands belonging to the Philippines in order to control the West Philippine Sea as well as exploit its resources. That is precisely why it is imperative for the Philippines to enforce its arbitral award.